| August 30, 2006
Regulation Comments
Chief Counsel’s Office
Office of Thrift Supervision
1700 G Street, NW
Washington, DC 20552
Re: Subordinated Debt Securities and Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock
71 FR 37862 (July 3, 2006), Attention:
No. 2006-24
Dear Sir or Madam:
America’s Community Bankers (“ACB”) is pleased to comment on the Office of
Thrift Supervision’s (“OTS”) proposed revisions to its rule at 12 CFR 563.81
governing the inclusion of subordinated debt securities or mandatorily
redeemable preferred stock (“covered securities”) in supplementary capital. The
OTS’s proposed revisions to section 563.81 would update, clarify, and conform
certain provisions of the rule to provisions of the rules of the other federal
banking agencies governing the use of covered securities as supplementary
capital.
ACB Position
ACB supports OTS’s proposed revisions to section 563.81 governing savings
association issuances of covered securities as supplementary or Tier 2 capital.
The revisions are a much-needed update to this important rule. The revisions
provide clarity to the rule and greater flexibility to savings associations that
wish to use covered securities as Tier 2 capital. The proposed revisions also
conform certain provisions to the rules of the other bank regulatory agencies.
In particular ACB supports: i) the revised application and notice provisions;
ii) the elimination of the purchaser prohibitions giving savings associations a
broader market than previously permitted for the public distribution of covered
securities; and iii) the change in the minimum maturity requirement from seven
years to a five year “original weighted average maturity,” conforming the
minimum maturity requirement to that of the other bank regulatory agencies. We
would also urge the OTS to exempt subordinated debt issuances from the indenture
requirement when covered securities are sold to accredited investors.
Background
ACB supports the revised application and notice procedures for issuing covered
securities as
Tier 2 capital. The revised section 563.81 would allow the savings association
to file either an application or a notice before or after the savings
association issues covered securities. The covered securities may not be used as
supplementary capital until the OTS approves the application or does not object
to the notice. ACB supports this revision because of the flexibility in
permitting savings associations to file a notice rather than an application with
the OTS. The savings association may include the covered securities as Tier 2
capital unless the OTS objects to the notice. However, we believe that the OTS
should establish a 30-day time limit within which to object to a notice. This
gives the savings association a safe harbor and certainty that the covered
securities can be treated as Tier 2 capital without further action.
ACB supports the proposed revisions to section 563.81 that would delete the
provisions in the existing rule that prohibit the sale of covered securities to
certain purchasers. Eliminating the purchaser restrictions gives savings
associations a broader market for covered securities and brings the rule in line
with the other bank regulators that do not restrict the purchasers of covered
securities. Under the existing the rule, covered securities could not be sold to
another savings association or to a corporate affiliate of such savings
association. We agree that this restriction is not needed for covered securities
to adequately serve as Tier 2 capital, and we support the deletion of this
restriction.
The OTS also proposes to revise the indenture requirements of section 563.81.
The proposal would update the monetary thresholds to conform with the changes to
the Trust Indenture Act of 1939. This revision is consistent with the Securities
Act of 1933 and the Trust Indenture Act of 1939. ACB supports this revision. The
OTS also requests comments on whether section 563.81 should be further amended
to provide a waiver of the indenture requirement when covered securities are
sold to affiliated or unaffiliated accredited investors. Accredited investors
are sophisticated investors that can protect their interests and do not require
the protections that are necessary for other investors. ACB supports adding this
exemption to the rule as it would reduce the burden on the savings association
to unnecessarily provide an indenture.
Covered securities treated as Tier 2 capital may not be subject to mandatory
prepayment except for certain stated events of default under the current rule.
We support the OTS restatement of the current rules that limit mandatory
prepayment to specific events of default. We believe that the OTS should not
narrow this provision because it would unreasonably restrict the mandatory
prepayment provisions for issuances of covered securities for savings
associations. There is no evidence cited in the proposal that these events of
default have created a problem for savings associations in the past. As
additional protection, the proposed rule would continue to require OTS approval
of any acceleration of payment of principal of a covered security of a savings
association that fails to meet certain capital requirements.
Finally, ACB supports the reduction of the minimum maturity of covered
securities from seven years to a minimum five-year original weighted maturity
(“minimum weighted maturity”). This revision would conform the OTS rule to the
maturity requirements of the other bank regulatory agencies. The minimum
weighted maturity gives institutions flexibility to reduce covered securities
earlier than the required formula under the current rule and vary the dollar
amount of debt that can be repaid in a particular year. The flexibility can help
savings associations negotiate favorable terms with underwriters and enhance
marketability of covered securities to the public.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important rule that governs
covered securities as Tier 2 capital. Should you have any questions, please
contact Patty Milon at 202-857-3121 or at
[email protected] or the undersigned at 202-857-3186 or at
[email protected].
Sincerely,
Sharon A. Haeger
Regulatory Counsel
|